The first thing I had to do was create a list of all the reasonable options I have available. I am sure I could come up with a list of about twenty options because of all the choices I have within a specific procedure and even the possibility of combining different procedures. I ended up listing six procedures. The next thing I did was create a list of concerns with each procedure and assign a weight for each of these concerns. For me the most important concern was "what are the chances that this will eliminate all of the cancer cells". Because this was the most important factor I assigned this a weight of 10. At the other end I listed external scars as a concern. Because this is not that important to me I assigned this a weight of 2.
The last thing I did was to rate each of the concerns against all of the options with an input number. For instance, since a radical prostatatectomy will leave a fairly significant scar around my midsection I gave it an input number of 2. Robotic surgery will leave small incisions around my midsection I gave it an input number of 6. This is the most subjective part of this exercise. I think ranking the concern for each procedure is pretty straightforward but whether an input number should be a 5 or a 6 can always be debated.
Input | |||||||
Weight | Concern | ||||||
A | B | C | D | E | F | ||
10 | Odds of 100% Cancer Removal | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
8 | Minimum Collateral Damage | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 10 |
2 | External Scars | 6 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 |
7 | Leaves other options open | 7 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 10 |
Procedures
A | Robotic Surgery |
B | Radical Prostatectomy |
C | External Beam Radiation |
D | Seed Implantation |
E | Cryotherapy |
F | Watchful Waiting |
Once all of the input data has been entered I simply multiplied the input data by the weight to calculate a number for each concern for each procedure. I then simply added these numbers together to arrive at a total score for each procedure.
As you can see from the table below the robotic surgery came out with the highest number which means it appears to be the best option for me. I am sure that some of my input numbers will change as I learn more about each procedure. I also suspect that I will add one or two concerns over time but I think this is a good starting point. My sessions with the specialists in each of the procedures will certainly help me refine my matrix. I am scheduled to have all of these consultations complete by the first week of July. After that date the ball will be firmly in my court and I will have a big decision to make.
If anyone has any ideas on how to improve my analysis I would love to hear from you!
Score | |||||||
Weight | Concern | A | B | C | D | E | F |
10 | Odds of 100% Cancer Removal | 80 | 80 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 0 |
8 | Minimum Collateral Damage | 56 | 48 | 32 | 40 | 40 | 80 |
2 | External Scars | 12 | 4 | 16 | 16 | 20 | 20 |
7 | Leaves other options open | 49 | 49 | 21 | 28 | 49 | 70 |
Total | 197 | 181 | 139 | 154 | 179 | 170 | |
I like your analytical approach. Interested to see how it evolves.
ReplyDeleteDitto
ReplyDelete